We all live in diet culture, a society obsessed with thinness and dieting. Weight and food biases permeate the air we breathe, tingeing our thoughts and actions in ways sometimes hard to notice. Providers, patients—none of us—are immune to these biases. They’re often subtle and deeply embedded, and left unexamined and unchecked, they can manifest in interactions between patients and even the most capable, well-intentioned providers.
In this article, we define and discuss weight and food bias, including its perpetuating factors and health consequences. Learn the impact of weight stigma and how to recognize and counter implicit and explicit bias in yourself, your practice, and in our larger society.
Weight bias refers to negative attitudes, beliefs, or assumptions about others based on body weight or size. Internalized weight bias occurs when these negative weight-related beliefs are absorbed and held about oneself.
Weight bias can lead to weight stigma, or the disapproval of someone based on their weight. Stigma is seeing someone negatively because of their weight, which can in turn lead to treating someone negatively because of it. Stigma manifests in stereotyping, bullying, and discrimination on the basis of weight, as well as exclusion and marginalization in media, professional, health care, and other settings. While weight bias harms people of all sizes, those who live in bodies that do not conform to “normal” body size expectations experience the greatest weight stigmatization.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) describes body sizes using body mass index (BMI), a measure of a person’s weight relative to their height. Importantly, the BMI does not account for sex and racial differences, muscle mass, or overall body composition, and as the CDC acknowledges, it is “not diagnostic of body fatness or the health of an individual.”
The CDC’s BMI categories include:
Weight stigma manifests in all areas of life. It can be expressed in both private and public settings by family members, friends and peers, employers, health care and other professionals, and institutions. Comments, images, or behaviors that indicate disapproval of, make judgments about, or outright harass or exclude those in larger bodies are examples of stigmatization. Other examples include a reluctance to serve, accommodate, work with, or care for a person because of their weight, as well as marketing and other messages that tout diet products as a way to “fix” the assumed problem of weight.
Additional examples of weight stigma in everyday life include:
These examples make visible weight-biased beliefs that associate people in higher-weight bodies with laziness, lack of willpower, poor lifestyle choices, lack of moral character, bad hygiene, a low level of intelligence, and unattractiveness.
Ample research confirms that weight stigmatization is not only pervasive but incredibly harmful. Studies show that people categorized with BMIs considered “overweight” or “obese” are at much greater risk of being stigmatized. According to one such study from the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity (as reported by the WHO):
Popular narratives may contribute to weight stigma by oversimplifying body weight, suggesting that it is a direct result of personal habits and a determinant of a person’s health or character. Such narratives often focus on individual behaviors and perceived failures. With messages like “eat less; move more,” they neglect to take into consideration important biological, social, economic, and environmental factors, including food security, economic stability, and community resources.
As a primary cultural storyteller, media often reinforce weight stigma by perpetuating negative, stereotypical portrayals of higher-weight people. Research shows that 72% of media images and 77% of videos include these stereotypical portrayals. Larger-bodied characters are also severely underrepresented in media. When they do appear, they are often punchlines (“Fat Monica” in Friends, for example), villains (The Little Mermaid’s Ursula), or portrayed as dim-witted (Homer Simpson). They rarely have fully developed characters or storylines.
Shaming, harassing, or criticizing people about their weight and/or eating patterns is often done to “motivate” people to change their behavior. However, research and lived experience reveal the opposite effect.
Like other types of stigmatization and discrimination, weight stigma is associated with significant physiological and psychological consequences. They include:
Weight stigma can also affect the quality of care for patients who receive it, ultimately leading to poor health outcomes and increased risk of mortality.
Weight bias isn’t the only bias pushed by diet culture—food bias exists as well. Our culture often thinks of food in terms of moral terms:
Moreover, too often people assign value to themselves for eating so-called “bad” foods. Comments like “I’m being so bad tonight, ordering the pizza instead of a salad” or “I’m cheating tonight” imply that we are better or worse people depending on the food decisions we make.
As with many changes, the first place to look is at ourselves. The thoughts and feelings we have about our own and others’ bodies influence how we interact with patients, colleagues, and others in our lives.
A good starting point is to examine our implicit biases, which we all have. The Harvard Weight Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a validated measure of unconscious attitudes and beliefs about weight. It is available to take for free.
Other questions to ask yourself include:
Choose which individuals and organizations to give your social media “likes” and real-life dollars to. Here are some questions to ask yourself when interacting with brands and social media accounts:
To broaden acceptance of the diversity of sizes, we can also curate our feeds with messages that recognize and appreciate size diversity. We can unfollow or restrict accounts that perpetuate stereotypes about people in higher-weight bodies (or don’t represent them at all), and curate our feed so that it includes weight-inclusive and diverse accounts.
Some body positive spaces and influencers include:
Another way to influence change is by lending your voice to activist and advocacy efforts. Suggestions include:
Treatment for eating disorders of all types—including binge eating disorder—should not focus on weight loss. Though all of us live in a weight-obsessed world, the importance of weight is compounded for people with eating disorders; the preoccupation is often part of these illnesses.
What’s more, weight is not a behavior, and intentional weight loss does not heal an unhealthy relationship with food or the body. In fact, it often does just the opposite. Recovery, just like eating disorders, looks different on all patients. Some patients experience weight gain, others experience weight loss, and others still experience little to no weight changes at all.
Some practical considerations for eating disorder and other health professionals include:
Adopt an “all foods fit” approach free from food judgment. Removing moral value from food is an important part of a healthy relationship with food for all of us, and especially when challenging distortions present in disordered thoughts and behaviors.
Ellyn Sattler’s hierarchy of food needs is another way to understand food decisions in a less-biased way. Like Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Sattler’s hierarchy positions the elements that matter first at the bottom of the pyramid; at the top are more complex needs.
In Sattler’s pyramid, the most basic food need is having enough food to eat. Once that need is met, people can seek food that is acceptable (e.g., not spoiled or rotten), then food that is accessible and reliable. As people move up the pyramid, they can seek food that is good-tasting, then novel, then instrumental.
Weight-inclusive care accepts and respects body diversity and focuses on health instead of weight. Health At Every Size® (HAES) offers an approach that promotes health-related behaviors that improve well-being in a holistic sense. Its basic principles include:
Weight bias and stigma are prevalent and consequential—and it’s on all of us to recognize, acknowledge, and challenge it in ourselves, in others, and in the places and institutions we inhabit.
To help your patient make peace with food and their body, connect them to eating disorder specialty care as soon as possible. Make a referral online or by calling 1-888-364-5977 today.
Call 888-364-5977 for help now.
The Emily Program is a University of Minnesota Medical School Affiliate
Copyright © 2019 - Emily Program. All rights reserved.
By clicking “Send” below, you are indicating that you understand and agree to these terms regarding the use of your information:
The information you submit on this form will be used internally for the purposes of processing and responding to your request. It may be routed internally in order to find the most appropriate member of staff to handle your request and your contact information will only be used to respond to your inquiry if you indicate permission to do so.
In addition, the information submitted may become a part of the patient’s permanent chart or treatment record at The Emily Program upon their utilization of The Emily Program services, and this information may be used in the planning of treatment and care provided to the patient. At the time the patient utilizes The Emily Program services, The Emily Program’s Notice of Privacy Practices and other HIPAA and information privacy and security policies will apply to the information submitted on this form and to any other information that The Emily Program maintains about the patient and the care provided to the patient.
Your information has been submitted.